1) That the price of decay happens to be constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances into the specimen dated haven’t been modified during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that whenever the rock first formed it included an understood amount of daughter product (“Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)
We ought to observe that processes that are past never be occurring at all today, and that some might have happened at prices and intensities far not the same as comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes plus the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
Jesus cursed the bottom (the stones too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed could be the ground for the benefit”
If this occurred there was clearly a burst of radioactity that made the stones look more than these were.
Would not this make most of the rocks look the age that is same?
“The rock real question is quite simple and contains regarding the elements that are basic comprised these stones at the beginning. Whenever each one of these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. were started up, it could simply be normal to allow them to act in accordance with their specific properties, sooner or later acquiring stable half-lives of decay, at various prices. Suppose at first every radioactive element had been “exploded” into existence from pre-existent elements. None of the early quicker half-lives is the just like they have been today.
As time progressed each would commence to obtain its slow modern-day stable half-life, but would all of them get these stable prices in a uniformity which may have them all in synchrony? I question it. You are right if they did, all would give the same ages. Each could possibly get to balance at different occuring times.
Glance at biological breakdown every where, it proceeds at various prices. Go through the globe from a devolutionary viewpoint and observe how excellence happens to be lost and breakdown has proceeded in spurts and stasis periods. Many of us have actually lost more details than the others, this is exactly why most are at Harvard, but others, more regrettable, the exact same age have a problem with debilitating hereditary degenerative diseases like Lupus, MS, ALS, Crohn’s and several other diseases that are autoimmune. The tips of that are locked when you look at the “vault of degeneration knowledge” that evolutionists are unwilling to start for fear we creationists may be proper.” Jack Cuozzo 3/02
Carbon dates they did in contrast to
Carbon relationship is often an embarrassment to researchers. Check out Carbon 14 dates which were refused since they didn’t accept development
(then your web browser does not support tables – please email me for these dates if you do not see a chart below)
Antarctic seawater has a low amount of C14. Consequently organisms residing here dated by C14 give many years much more than their true age.
There are lots of more examples that we shall include later on. Nevertheless the people above provide you with a general concept.
There are some other ways of dating. They too, provide diverse outcomes.
The potassium-argon come utilizzare the league technique ended up being accustomed date volcanic product in this next instance.
Volcanic ash has additionally been recognized to provide times much more than they really were .
Lava moves at Mt Ngauruhoe, brand new Zealand provided dates that are erroneousfrom K-Ar analyses) including
Has got the price of decay stayed constant?
The problem that is biggest with dating techniques may be the presumption that the price of decay has remained constant. There’s no real solution to show it. In fact there clearly was much proof to show this rate have not remained constant, and therefore it’s decaying faster and faster. Precisely what the bible, and a Devolution and degenerating model of the planet would anticipate.
a laugh about Dinosaurs and dating
Some tourists within the United states Museum of Natural History had been marveling at the dinosaur bones on display. One of these asked the guard, “Can you let me know exactly how old the dinosaur bones are?”
The guard responded, “they’ve been 65 million, four years, and 6 months old.”
“that is an awfully precise quantity,” claims the tourist. “just how do you understand their age so precisely?”
The guard responded, “Well, the dinosaur bones were sixty five million yrs . old whenever I began working right here, and therefore had been four and a years that are half.”
Ahead this site to your friends and relations
If this website was enjoyed by you, make sure to inform your buddies about any of it.
When you have any queries on production, Evolution, or would like to state “Hi” please do not hesitate to e-mail me personally.
Carbon dating sources:
1) From a video Lecture by Dr. Kent Hovind
6)Antarctic Journal, Washington 10)”Dry bones as well as other fossils” by Dr. Gary Parker